The German gaming industry association sees the coalition agreement as a solid basis for a successful gaming policy – European Gaming Industry News


Reading time: 2 minutes

Thuringia, a small state in central Germany, is proposing legislation that would give it autonomous control over iGaming within its borders. If passed, Lotto Thüringen, the company that currently owns the state-run lottery, would become the sole operator of vertical iGaming tables in the state.

The bill has been submitted to the European Commission for approval, amending its 2004 Casinos Act. The Thuringian Bill on Online Casinos and Casinos would introduce a monopoly on online table games. This is permitted by German gambling law, which allows each state to apply its own gambling laws.

The legislation calls for the issuance of exclusive ten-year licenses for online table games, which are distinct from online slots. The most likely operator would be Lotto Thüringen, which the bill says would generate additional revenue for the state.

The country’s newly regulated iGaming market launched earlier this year, with the country’s third interstate gaming treaty coming into effect on July 1. It enables online casino licensing of slot machines and allows states to control online table games. This should protect state lottery operators.

States with land-based casino licenses can issue the same number of online table gaming licenses that are granted to physical sites. However, as Thuringia does not have any land-based casinos, it has the possibility of giving exclusive rights to the state lottery.

The submitted bill claims that a monopoly approach is desirable as online table games present an “increased risk of manipulation”, as the organizer is also the banker. This implies that applicants would have to provide a high level of provisional details to obtain rights. The bill is now in a standstill period until February 24.

State monopolies on games have proven to be a controversial solution in the past. In 2010, the European Court of Justice ruled that the German gambling laws applied at the time, which helped protect state monopolies, were not “justifiable”.

In a statement, European judges said that the public monopoly on the organization of sports betting and lotteries in Germany did not pursue the objective of tackling the danger of gambling “in a consistent and systematic way”. which was the argument put forward to protect them.


Comments are closed.